Douglas G. Dawson
519-672-2108 ext. 223
519-672-2108 ext. 239
Douglas Dawson is a partner at McCall Dawson LLP. Doug earned a Bachelor’s Degree at Université de Besançon, Diplôme d’études Universitaires Générales (BA equivalent) in 1975; University of Western Ontario Honours French in 1976. He graduated from the Faculty of Law at the University of Ottawa (cum laude) in 1981. Doug has been representing insurers since he was called to the Bar of Ontario in 1981. He acts for many transit commissions in Ontario and represents various insurers with respect to bodily injury and property damage claims. Doug has extensive experience in all aspects of litigation practice, including administrative tribunal hearings, and has appeared in all levels of court in Ontario including the Court of Appeal.
Superior Court of Justice
Connolly v. St. Catharines Transit (2011) – Plaintiff’s action for assault on bus by unknown assailant dismissed. Costs awarded to the defendant.
Hutchings v. Nevin et al (1992) – Plaintiff’s claim for damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident. The defendant was operating a motor vehicle with the consent of the plaintiff. Defendant denied that he was negligent as he was suffering from an illness of the mind that rendered him incapable of appreciating the duty of care he owed the plaintiff. Held - the defendant was not liable in negligence to the plaintiff. Action dismissed.
Schon v. Hodgins (1988) – Plaintiff’s claim for damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident. Defendant driver’s degree of fault or negligence limited to 25%.
Decision No.675/88 (1988) O.W.C.A.T.D. No.1209 – Defendants in a civil case applied to determine whether the plaintiff’s right of action was taken away. Plaintiff was a driver and owner of a truck which was involved in an action. Plaintiff was an employee of the defendant. The plaintiff brought an action against the defendant and against the company repairing the truck for personal injury and for economic loss from failure to repair the truck in a timely fashion. The right of action for damages resulting from the delay in repair of the truck was not taken away. The right of action regarding personal injury was taken away.
Decision No.2258/08 (2010) O.W.S.I.A.T.D. No.718 – The defendant in a civil case, Terrace Bay Enterprises, applied to determine whether the plaintiff’s right of action was taken away. The defendant Enterprise Rent-A-Car Limited was an interested party. It was determined that Enterprise Rent-A-Car Limited was entitled to a declaration pursuant to Subsection 29(4) of the Act that no damages, contribution or indemnity for the portion of loss or damage determined by the Court under Subsection 29(3) to be caused by the fault or negligence of Terrace Bay Enterprises is recoverable in the action filed in Court File No.S3690/05..